Tuesday, December 4, 2007

A Safer Option to Mammography

Despite what the conventional medical community will tell you, regular mammograms are not in your best interest. In fact yearly mammograms have proven not to be a factor in overall breast cancer prevention. As the following article will show, not only are they not necessary, but they can be extremely harmful due to radiation exposure and other risks.

Finding cancer at the very earliest stage is not necessarily the end-all that conventional medicine promotes. The body develops cancer cells every day and it is supposed that everyone develops very small tumors. In a healthy body (healthy immune system) the body will recognize these cells and small tumors and dispose of them in a natural way. The key is to keep the immune system functioning at healthy levels. However, if we automatically begin drugging and radiating the smallest of these growths, in the long run, we may be doing ourselves more harm than good when, if left alone, the body would take care of the concern on its own.

This piece also presents a diagnostic tool for breast cancer that can serve as an alternative to mammography. It is not usually offered by most practitioners, but as a savvy consumer, you should be aware of it and request it in lieu of exposing yourself to the hazards of mammography. As women become more knowledgeable and proactive regarding health care issues, safer, more effective, and less invasive procedures such as this will become more widely available.

Thermography: A Safer Option for Breast Cancer Detection
by Mary Laredo http://www.NewsTarget.com/022227.html

(NewsTarget) The occurrence of breast cancer has dramatically increased in the past 50 years and the medical establishment encourages the use of annual mammogram screenings as a womans best option for early detection. In fact, for more than 30 years it has been the unquestioned, standard screening device used by the medical community. While mammography may be useful in certain situations, it has many disturbing drawbacks.

With toxic radiation, mammogram testing compresses sensitive breast tissue causing pain and possible tissue damage. To make matters worse, the false negative and false positive rates of mammography are a troubling 30% and 89% respectively.(1) Another concern is that many breast cancers occur below the armpits; however, mammography completely misses this auxiliary region, viewing only the breast tissue compressed between two plates of glass. Considering these drawbacks, breast thermography should be given closer consideration.

Thermography (also called thermology) is a little-known technique for breast cancer detection that has been available since the 1960s. It is non-invasive and non-toxic, using an infrared camera to measure thermal emissions from the entire chest and auxiliary regions. Cancerous tissue develops a blood supply to feed a growing tumor, and the abnormal blood vessel formations generate significantly more heat than the surrounding healthy tissue. The infrared camera detects the differences in heat emitted from abnormal tissue (including malignancies, benign tumors and fibrocystic disease), as compared to normal tissue. There is no physical contact with the patient, who stands several feet away from the camera while a technician takes a series of images.

A second set of images is taken following a cold challenge. The patient places her hands in ice cold water for one minute causing healthy tissue to constrict while the abnormal tumor tissue remains hot. The infrared scanner easily distinguishes the difference, and these images are compared with the first set for confirmation.

Thermography can detect abnormalities before the onset of a malignancy, and as early as ten years before being recognized by other procedures such as manual breast exam, mammography, ultrasound or MRI.(2) This makes it potentially life-saving for women who are unknowingly developing abnormalities, as it can take several years for a cancerous tumor to develop and be detected by mammogram. Its accuracy is also impressive, with false negative and false positive rates at 9% for each.(3) Thermography is also an effective way to establish a baseline for comparison with future scans; therefore, women should begin screening by the age of 25.

Although widely embraced by alternative health care practitioners, thermographys obscurity in the mainstream means that too many women rely on mammograms as their only option. There are several reasons for thermographys lack of support by the conventional medical community. Early thermal scanners were not very sensitive, nor were they well-tested before being used in clinical practice. This resulted in many misdiagnosed cases and its utter dismissal by the medical community. Since then the technology has advanced dramatically and thermography now uses highly sensitive state-of-the-art infrared cameras and sophisticated computers. A wealth of clinical research attests to its high degree of sensitivity and accuracy. In 1982, the FDA approved thermography for breast cancer screening, yet most of the medical establishment is either unaware of it or still associates it with its early false start. Since most women are also uninformed of the technology there is no pressure on the medical community to support it.

This author - who knows from first-hand experience the physical and emotional trauma of mammography as well as the passive and comforting accuracy of thermal scanning - would have been spared from years of radiation exposure with an earlier knowledge of thermography. The importance of education and awareness of this technology cannot be overstated.

When a thermographic report is negative, annual monitoring is essential to note any changes as early as possible. A positive report should be discussed with a health care practitioner as it may be necessary to follow up with another detection method such as mammography or ultrasound to identify the exact location of the abnormality and to determine whether tissue biopsy is needed. If mammography is used to complement the thermal scan, it is important to offset the affects of radiation prior to and following the procedure. Wheat grass juice, green super foods, or brown seaweed such as Modifilan are powerful detoxifiers.

Breast abnormalities and tumors are merely symptoms of imbalances within the bodys internal terrain that need to be identified and corrected. A thoughtful and careful look at diet, exposure to toxins, and lifestyle should be the first line of defense against any disease. This, and regular thermal screenings provide an effective arsenal against breast cancer. An internet search of thermography will locate qualified technicians in your area.

1. Saputo, MD. Len. Overview: Beyond Mammography. From his account of the Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project: Five Year summary Report CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, Vol 32, 194-225, Copyright 1982 by American Cancer Society.

2. International Academy of Clinical Thermology, www.iact-org.org

3. http://healthybreasts.info/ Summary from Value and Interest of Dynamic Telethermography in Detection of Breast Cancer, ACTA Thermographica, Vol. 1, Num. 2, 89-96, 1976.

1 comment:

  1. I am a Registered General Nurse, and I was delighted to see your article about thermal imaging. I am a practitioner located in a small coastal country town, halfway between Sydney & Brisbane, in Australia.

    I added Digital Infrared Thermal Imaging to my practise earlier this year.

    There are only about 19 cameras in the whole of Australia, with a poulation of 21 million, so you can appreciate we have much work to do !

    As yet it is still very mis-undertsood and unknown, and we have a large task ahead of us to convince women to try this amazing new non - invasive technology. Women are not being told the whole truth that mammograms are not an EARLY warning screening tool, as they cannot, on average, detect anything until it is at least 1 cm in diameter, and has been present for at least 8 -10 years in the body, to reach that size.

    I experienced the power of its early warning personally, when my colleague detected the formation of early blood supply in my Left breast two years ago. I treated myself rather than seeking mainstream help, and within 180 days the scans were clear and have remained that way. Such was the power of early detection! It convinced me to buy one and make this cutting edge technology available for my wonderful country clients!

    I have a Med2000 camera, and we no longer use the cold immersion technique you described. The latest computer technolgy is so accurate it is considered adequate.

    I look forward to reading your book.

    Patricia

    totalhealthoptions@bigpond.com

    ReplyDelete